On 2020-Nov-19, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:11:21PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Your patch didn't actually say "try_relation_open", so didn't work. > > But it does works if I do that, and close the table. Thanks for fixing and testing. > That patch broke the case that a non-index is passed, which I addressed here. Hmm, I think the reaction to that should be the same as before, so rather than return 0, the patch should raise the same error that index_open() would.
