Greetings, * osumi.takami...@fujitsu.com (osumi.takami...@fujitsu.com) wrote: > On Friday, Nov 20, 2020 9:33 AM Tsunakawa, Takayuki > <tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota....@gmail.com> > > > At Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:04:17 -0500, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> > > > > * Laurenz Albe (laurenz.a...@cybertec.at) wrote: > > > > > I missed that this is only a warning when I looked at it before. > > > > > Yes, it should be a fatal error. > > > > > > > > Yeah, the more that I think about it, the more that I tend to agree > > > > with this. Does anyone want to argue against changing this into a > > FATAL..? > > > > > > I don't come up with a use case where someone needs to set > > > wal_level=minimal for archive recovery. So +1 to change it to FATAL. > It seems we reached the agreement for this fix. > > > Thank you all. I'd like to give Osumi-san an opportunity to write a patch > > and > > showing the evidence of successful test if you don't mind. He is very young > > and newbie to Postgres, so even a small contribution would encourage him to > > make further contributions. > Sure. Let me do that, including the test.
That all sounds good to me. I would recommend starting a new thread on -hackers with the patch, once it's ready, since it's really independent from the topic of this thread. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
