Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > On 2020-Nov-23, Tom Lane wrote: >> Here's a draft patch.
> Here's another of my own. Outside of elog.c it seems identical. Ah, I see I didn't cover the case in ProcSleep that you were originally on about ... I'd just looked for existing references to log_min_messages and client_min_messages. I think it's important to have the explicit check for elevel >= ERROR. I'm not too fussed about whether we invent is_log_level_output_client, although that name doesn't seem well-chosen compared to is_log_level_output. Shall I press forward with this, or do you want to? regards, tom lane