Greetings, * Michael Paquier (mich...@paquier.xyz) wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 05:04:12PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> fallback implementation. Finally, pgcrypto is not touched, but we > > > > I have a fallback implemention --- it fails? ;-) Did you want me to > > include an AES implementation? > > No idea about this one yet. There are no direct users of AES except > pgcrypto in core. One thing that would be good IMO is to properly > split the patch of this thread into individual parts that could be > reviewed separately using for example "git format-patch" to generate > patch series. What's presented is a mixed bag, so that's harder to > look at it and consider how this stuff should work, and if there are > pieces that should be designed better or not.
I don't think there's any need for us to implement a fallback implementation of AES. I'm not entirely sure we need it for hashes but since we've already got it... Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature