so 26. 12. 2020 v 8:00 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>
napsal:

> Hi
>
>
> Thank you.
>> I have applied all your fixes in on_connect_event_trigger-12.patch.
>>
>> Concerning enable_client_connection_trigger GUC, I think that it is
>> really useful: it is the fastest and simplest way to disable login triggers
>> in case
>> of some problems with them (not only for superuser itself, but for all
>> users). Yes, it can be also done using "ALTER EVENT TRIGGER DISABLE".
>> But assume that you have a lot of databases with different login policies
>> enforced by on-login event triggers. And you want temporary disable them
>> all, for example for testing purposes.
>> In this case GUC is most convenient way to do it.
>>
>>
> There was typo in patch
>
> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
> index f810789..8861f1b 100644
> --- a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -<!-- doc/src/sgml/config.sgml -->
> +\<!-- doc/src/sgml/config.sgml -->
>
> I have not any objections against functionality or design. I tested the
> performance, and there are no negative impacts when this feature is not
> used. There is significant overhead related to plpgsql runtime
> initialization, but when this trigger will be used, then probably some
> other PLpgSQL procedures and functions will be used too, and then this
> overhead can be ignored.
>
> * make without warnings
> * make check-world passed
> * doc build passed
>
> Possible ToDo:
>
> The documentation can contain a note so usage connect triggers in
> environments with short life sessions and very short fast queries without
> usage PLpgSQL functions or procedures can have negative impact on
> performance due overhead of initialization of PLpgSQL engine.
>
> I'll mark this patch as ready for committers
>

looks so this patch has not entry in commitfestapp 2021-01

Regards

Pavel


> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
>
>>
>> Konstantin Knizhnik
>> Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
>> The Russian Postgres Company
>>
>>

Reply via email to