On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:26 AM Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 12:52 PM Zhihong Yu <z...@yugabyte.com> wrote: >> >> Hi,
Thanks for the review.
>> + for (i = 0; i < riinfo->nkeys; i++)
>> + {
>> + Oid eq_opr = eq_oprs[i];
>> + Oid typeid = RIAttType(fk_rel, riinfo->fk_attnums[i]);
>> + RI_CompareHashEntry *entry = ri_HashCompareOp(eq_opr, typeid);
>> +
>> + if (pk_nulls[i] != 'n' &&
>> OidIsValid(entry->cast_func_finfo.fn_oid))
>>
>> It seems the pk_nulls[i] != 'n' check can be lifted ahead of the assignment
>> to the three local variables. That way, ri_HashCompareOp wouldn't be called
>> when pk_nulls[i] == 'n'.
Good idea, so done. Although, there can't be nulls right now.
>> + case TM_Updated:
>> + if (IsolationUsesXactSnapshot())
>> ...
>> + case TM_Deleted:
>> + if (IsolationUsesXactSnapshot())
>>
>> It seems the handling for TM_Updated and TM_Deleted is the same. The cases
>> for these two values can be put next to each other (saving one block of
>> code).
Ah, yes. The TM_Updated case used to be handled a bit differently in
earlier unposted versions of the patch, though at some point I
concluded that the special handling was unnecessary, but didn't
realize what you just pointed out. Fixed.
> I'll pause on reviewing v4 until you've addressed the suggestions above.
Here's v5.
--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v5-0002-Avoid-using-SPI-for-some-RI-checks.patch
Description: Binary data
v5-0001-Export-get_partition_for_tuple.patch
Description: Binary data
