On 1/26/21 6:20 PM, Laurenz Albe wrote: > After thinking some more about it, I think that COMMIT AND CHAIN would have > to change behavior: if COMMIT throws an error (because the transaction was > aborted), no new transaction should be started. Everything else seems fishy: > the statement fails, but still starts a new transaction?
The standard is not clear (to me) on what exactly should happen here. It says that if a <commit statement> is not successful then a <rollback statement> is implied, but I don't see it say anything about whether the AND CHAIN should be propagated too. My vote is that COMMIT AND CHAIN should become ROLLBACK AND NO CHAIN. -- Vik Fearing
