David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> writes:
> What I can't understand is why you changed to a List-of-Lists rather
> than a List-of-Relids.
Yeah, I spent no effort on micro-optimizing the data structure. I figured
that since we were not including leaf partitions, there would never be
enough rels involved to worry about. Perhaps that's wrong though.
> Parent RT indexes are guaranteed to be lower than their children RT
> indexes,
I was intentionally avoiding that assumption ;-). Maybe it buys enough
to be worth the loss of generality, but ...
regards, tom lane
