út 2. 2. 2021 v 20:36 odesílatel Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes: > > When I fixed one plpgsql_check issue, I found another plpgsql issue. Now > we > > have field nstatements that hold a number of plpgsql statements in > > function. Unfortunately I made an error when I wrote this functionality > and > > for FOR statements, this counter is incremented 2x. Higher number than a > > real number is better than a lesser number, but it can be a source of > > problems too (inside plpgsql_check I iterate over 0 .. nstatements > stmtid, > > and due this bug I had a problem with missing statements). > > > Attached patch is pretty simple: > > Right, done. > Thank you for commit Regards Pavel > regards, tom lane >
