On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 03:30:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > 0001 is a clean simplification and a good catch, so I'll see about > applying it. 0002 just makes the code more confusing to the reader > IMO, and its interface could easily lead to unwanted errors.
0001 has been applied as of fabde52. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
