On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 12:57 AM Hannu Krosing <han...@google.com> wrote: > > The current proposal seems to miss the case of transaction pooling > (and statement pooling) where the same established connection > multiplexes transactions / statements from multiple remote clients.
Not at all. The current proposal is there to implement the PROXY protocol. It doesn't try to do anything with connection pooling at all. Solving a similar problem for connection poolers would also definitely be a useful thing, but it is entirely out of scope of this patch, and is a completely separate implementation. I'd definitely like to see that one solved as well, but let's look at it on a different thread so we don't derail this one. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
