> On Mar 16, 2021, at 10:48 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> I'm not entirely sure what's going on, but I think coming at this
> with the mindset that "amcheck has detected some corruption" is
> just going to lead you astray. Almost certainly, it's "amcheck
> is incorrectly claiming corruption". That might be from mis-decoding
> a TOAST-referencing datum. (Too bad the message doesn't report the
> TOAST OID it probed for, so we can see if that's sane or not.)
CopyStatistics seems to just copy Form_pg_statistic without regard for who owns
the toast. Is this safe? Looking at RemoveStatistics, I'm not sure that it
is. Anybody more familiar with this code care to give an opinion?
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
