Greetings,

* David Steele (da...@pgmasters.net) wrote:
> I had a look at the patch and the change and new documentation seem sensible
> to me.

Thanks!

> I think this phrase may be a bit too idiomatic:
> 
> +        consistent I/O load while also leaving some slop for checkpoint
> 
> Perhaps just:
> 
> +        consistent I/O load while also leaving some time for checkpoint

Yeah, good thought, updated.

> It seems to me that the discussion about changing the wording for GUCs not
> changeable after server should be saved for another patch as long as this
> patch follows the current convention.

Agreed.

Unless there's anything further on this, I'll plan to commit it tomorrow
or Wednesday.

Thanks!

Stephen
From 3ebe08dee4b9dfe2dff51fd1bad2eb36834e82ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:53:34 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Change the default of checkpoint_completion_target to 0.9

Common recommendations are that the checkpoint should be spread out as
much as possible, provided we avoid having it take too long.  This
change updates the default to 0.9 (from 0.5) to match that
recommendation.

There was some debate about possibly removing the option entirely but it
seems there may be some corner-cases where having it set much lower to
try to force the checkpoint to be as fast as possible could result in
fewer periods of time of reduced performance due to kernel flushing.
General agreement is that the "spread more" is the preferred approach
though and those who need to tune away from that value are much less
common.

Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier, Peter Eisentraut, Tom Lane, David Steele
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201207175329.GM16415%40tamriel.snowman.net
---
 doc/src/sgml/config.sgml                      | 12 ++++++--
 doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml                         | 29 ++++++++++++-------
 src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c                  |  2 +-
 src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample |  2 +-
 src/test/recovery/t/015_promotion_pages.pl    |  1 -
 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
index 5679b40dd5..44763f0180 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
@@ -3302,9 +3302,15 @@ include_dir 'conf.d'
       <listitem>
        <para>
         Specifies the target of checkpoint completion, as a fraction of
-        total time between checkpoints. The default is 0.5.
-        This parameter can only be set in the <filename>postgresql.conf</filename>
-        file or on the server command line.
+        total time between checkpoints. The default is 0.9, which spreads the
+        checkpoint across almost all of the available interval, providing fairly
+        consistent I/O load while also leaving some time for checkpoint
+        completion overhead.  Reducing this parameter is not recommended as that
+        causes the I/O from the checkpoint to have to complete faster, resulting
+        in a higher I/O rate, while then having a period of less I/O between the
+        completion of the checkpoint and the start of the next scheduled
+        checkpoint.  This parameter can only be set in the
+        <filename>postgresql.conf</filename> file or on the server command line.
        </para>
       </listitem>
      </varlistentry>
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml
index ae4a3c1293..4354051c7b 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml
@@ -571,22 +571,29 @@
    writing dirty buffers during a checkpoint is spread over a period of time.
    That period is controlled by
    <xref linkend="guc-checkpoint-completion-target"/>, which is
-   given as a fraction of the checkpoint interval.
+   given as a fraction of the checkpoint interval (configured by using
+   <varname>checkpoint_timeout</varname>).
    The I/O rate is adjusted so that the checkpoint finishes when the
    given fraction of
    <varname>checkpoint_timeout</varname> seconds have elapsed, or before
    <varname>max_wal_size</varname> is exceeded, whichever is sooner.
-   With the default value of 0.5,
+   With the default value of 0.9,
    <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> can be expected to complete each checkpoint
-   in about half the time before the next checkpoint starts.  On a system
-   that's very close to maximum I/O throughput during normal operation,
-   you might want to increase <varname>checkpoint_completion_target</varname>
-   to reduce the I/O load from checkpoints.  The disadvantage of this is that
-   prolonging checkpoints affects recovery time, because more WAL segments
-   will need to be kept around for possible use in recovery.  Although
-   <varname>checkpoint_completion_target</varname> can be set as high as 1.0,
-   it is best to keep it less than that (perhaps 0.9 at most) since
-   checkpoints include some other activities besides writing dirty buffers.
+   a bit before the next scheduled checkpoint (at around 90% of the last checkpoint's
+   duration).  This spreads out the I/O as much as possible to have the I/O load be
+   consistent during the checkpoint.  The disadvantage of this is that prolonging
+   checkpoints affects recovery time, because more WAL segments will need to be kept
+   around for possible use in recovery.  A user concerned about the amount of time
+   required to recover might wish to reduce <varname>checkpoint_timeout</varname>,
+   causing checkpoints to happen more frequently while still spreading out the I/O
+   from each checkpoint.  Alternatively,
+   <varname>checkpoint_completion_target</varname> could be reduced, but this would
+   result in times of more intense I/O (during the checkpoint) and times of less I/O
+   (after the checkpoint completed but before the next scheduled checkpoint) and
+   therefore is not recommended.
+   Although <varname>checkpoint_completion_target</varname> could be set as high as
+   1.0, it is best to keep it less than that (such as at the default of 0.9, at most)
+   since checkpoints include some other activities besides writing dirty buffers.
    A setting of 1.0 is quite likely to result in checkpoints not being
    completed on time, which would result in performance loss due to
    unexpected variation in the number of WAL segments needed.
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
index 3b36a31a47..5fe7f2fa01 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
@@ -3727,7 +3727,7 @@ static struct config_real ConfigureNamesReal[] =
 			NULL
 		},
 		&CheckPointCompletionTarget,
-		0.5, 0.0, 1.0,
+		0.9, 0.0, 1.0,
 		NULL, NULL, NULL
 	},
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample b/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample
index 86425965d0..68f95bdfff 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample
+++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
 #checkpoint_timeout = 5min		# range 30s-1d
 #max_wal_size = 1GB
 #min_wal_size = 80MB
-#checkpoint_completion_target = 0.5	# checkpoint target duration, 0.0 - 1.0
+#checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9	# checkpoint target duration, 0.0 - 1.0
 #checkpoint_flush_after = 0		# measured in pages, 0 disables
 #checkpoint_warning = 30s		# 0 disables
 
diff --git a/src/test/recovery/t/015_promotion_pages.pl b/src/test/recovery/t/015_promotion_pages.pl
index 6fb70b5001..25a9e4764a 100644
--- a/src/test/recovery/t/015_promotion_pages.pl
+++ b/src/test/recovery/t/015_promotion_pages.pl
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ my $bravo = get_new_node('bravo');
 $bravo->init_from_backup($alpha, 'bkp', has_streaming => 1);
 $bravo->append_conf('postgresql.conf', <<EOF);
 checkpoint_timeout=1h
-checkpoint_completion_target=0.9
 EOF
 $bravo->start;
 
-- 
2.27.0

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to