Greetings, * tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com (tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com) wrote: > From: Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> > > * tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com (tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com) wrote: > > As for data loading tools, surely they support loading data into UNLOGGED > > tables and it's certainly not hard to have a script run around and flip > > those > > tables to LOGGED after they're loaded, and I do actually believe some of > > those > > tools support building processes of which one step could be such a command > > (I'm fairly confident Pentaho, in particular, does as I remember building > > such > > pipelines myself...). > > Oh, Pentaho has such a feature, doesn't it? But isn't it a separate step > from the data output step? Here, I assume ETL tools allow users to compose a > data loading job from multiple steps: data input, transformation, data > output, etc. I guess the user can't directly incorporate ALTER TABLE into > the data output step, and has to add separate custom steps for ALTER TABLE. > That's burdonsome and forgettable, I think.
None of the arguments presented here has done anything to change my opinion that adding a 'none' WAL level is a bad idea. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
