Julien Rouhaud <rjuju...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 02:47:05PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote: >> I'd say that this is certainly wrong: >> SELECT point('NaN','NaN') <@ polygon('(0,0),(1,0),(1,1),(0,0)'); >> >> ?column? >> ---------- >> t >> (1 row)
> Yeah that's what I think too, but I wanted to have confirmation. Agreed --- one could make an argument for either 'false' or NULL result, but surely not 'true'. I wonder if Horiguchi-san's patch [1] improves this case. regards, tom lane [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/2710/