> > > > I suppose if the possibility exists that this could happen, perhaps using > > RLS for selects is not quite "production ready"? > > I would not draw that conclusion. > > This is great to hear! I'm betting a lot on RLS and have been investing a lot into it.
> > Or perhaps if the RLS > > qual/check is written well-enough, then maybe the performance hit > wouldn't > > be noticed? > > Yes. > Amazing to hear. Sounds like the path I'm on is good to go and will only improve over time :) Final question: do you think using procedures vs writing inline queries for RLS quals/checks has a big difference in performance (assuming functions are sql)? Appreciate your info here!
