Hi, I rebased the patch because the cfbot failed.
Regards, Yugo Nagata On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:27:50 +0900 Yugo NAGATA <nag...@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: > On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:20:49 +0900 > Yugo NAGATA <nag...@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:42:00 -0500 > > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2/18/21 9:01 PM, Yugo NAGATA wrote: > > > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:38:44 +0800 > > > > Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 9:33 AM Yugo NAGATA <nag...@sraoss.co.jp> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi, > > > >>> > > > >>> Attached is a rebased patch (v22a). > > > >>> > > > >> Thanks for the patch. Will you think posting a patch with the latest > > > >> commit > > > >> at that > > > >> time is helpful? If so, when others want to review it, they know which > > > >> commit to > > > >> apply the patch without asking for a new rebase usually. > > > > I rebased the patch because cfbot failed. > > > > http://cfbot.cputube.org/ > > > > > > > > > > It's bitrotted a bit more dues to commits bb437f995d and 25936fd46c > > > > Thank you for letting me konw. I'll rebase it soon. > > Done. Attached is a rebased patch set. > > Regards, > Yugo Nagata > > -- > Yugo NAGATA <nag...@sraoss.co.jp> -- Yugo NAGATA <nag...@sraoss.co.jp>
IVM_patches_v22c.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip
