Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:22:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Buildfarm suggests this has some issues under force_parallel_mode.
>> I'm wondering about missed fields in outfuncs/readfuncs, or the like.
> The problem looks a bit more fundamental to me, as there seems to be
> some confusion with the concept of what should be the query string
> when it comes to prosqlbody with a parallel run, as it replaces prosrc
> in some cases where the function uses SQL as language. If the
> buildfarm cannot be put back to green, could it be possible to revert
> this patch?
Andres pushed a stopgap fix. We might end up reverting the patch
altogether for v14, but I don't want to be hasty. This should be enough
to let people take advantage of the last few hours before feature freeze.
regards, tom lane
