On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:49:00AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Yes, you are right here. I missed the parts before > mock_scram_secret() gets called and there are comments in the whole > area. Hmm, at the end of the day, I think that would just have > verify_client_proof() fill in logdetail when the client proof does not > match, and use a wording different than what's proposed upthread to > outline that this is a client proof mismatch.
Seeing no updates, this has been marked as RwF. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
