On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 01:18:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > One question here is whether it's correct that the domain's dependency > on collation "aa_DJ" is unversioned. Maybe that's intentional, but it > seems worth asking.
This is intentional I think, we should record collation version only for object that might break if the collation version is updated. So creating an index on that domain would record the collation version. > Anyway, there are two pretty obvious bugs in the dependencies for the > domain's CHECK constraint: the version for collation mycoll leaks > into the entry for function foo, and an entirely useless (because > unversioned) dependency is recorded on the default collation. Agreed. > (To be clear: 0002 passes check-world as-is, while 0001 is not > committable without some regression-test fiddling.) I'm probably missing something obvious but both 0001 and 0002 pass check-world for me, on a glibc box and --with-icu. > Thoughts? I think this is an open item, so I added one for now.
