On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 4:23 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju...@gmail.com> wrote: > So IIUC the issue here is that the code could previously record useless > collation version dependencies in somes cases, which could lead to false > positive possible corruption messages (and of course additional bloat on > pg_depend). False positive messages can't be avoided anyway, as a collation > version update may not corrupt the actually indexed set of data, especially > for > glibc.
This argument seems completely absurd to me. -- Peter Geoghegan
