> On Apr 23, 2021, at 10:31 AM, Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com>
> wrote:
>
> I will test your patch and see what differs.
Here are the differences between master and you patch:
UPDATE $toastname SET chunk_seq = chunk_seq + 1000 WHERE chunk_id =
$value_id_to_corrupt
- qr/${header}toast value 16459 chunk 0 has sequence
number 1000, but expected sequence number 0/,
- qr/${header}toast value 16459 chunk 1 has sequence
number 1001, but expected sequence number 1/,
- qr/${header}toast value 16459 chunk 2 has sequence
number 1002, but expected sequence number 2/,
- qr/${header}toast value 16459 chunk 3 has sequence
number 1003, but expected sequence number 3/,
- qr/${header}toast value 16459 chunk 4 has sequence
number 1004, but expected sequence number 4/,
- qr/${header}toast value 16459 chunk 5 has sequence
number 1005, but expected sequence number 5/;
+ qr/${header}toast value 16459 index scan returned chunk 1000
when expecting chunk 0/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16459 chunk 1000 follows last expected
chunk 5/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16459 chunk 1001 follows last expected
chunk 5/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16459 chunk 1002 follows last expected
chunk 5/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16459 chunk 1003 follows last expected
chunk 5/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16459 chunk 1004 follows last expected
chunk 5/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16459 chunk 1005 follows last expected
chunk 5/;
UPDATE $toastname SET chunk_seq = chunk_seq * 1000 WHERE chunk_id =
$value_id_to_corrupt
- qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 1
has sequence number 1000, but expected sequence number 1/,
- qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 2
has sequence number 2000, but expected sequence number 2/,
- qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 3
has sequence number 3000, but expected sequence number 3/,
- qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 4
has sequence number 4000, but expected sequence number 4/,
- qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 5
has sequence number 5000, but expected sequence number 5/;
-
+ qr/${header}toast value 16460 index scan returned chunk 1000
when expecting chunk 1/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16460 chunk 1000 follows last expected
chunk 5/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16460 index scan returned chunk 2000
when expecting chunk 1001/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16460 chunk 2000 follows last expected
chunk 5/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16460 index scan returned chunk 3000
when expecting chunk 2001/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16460 chunk 3000 follows last expected
chunk 5/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16460 index scan returned chunk 4000
when expecting chunk 3001/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16460 chunk 4000 follows last expected
chunk 5/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16460 index scan returned chunk 5000
when expecting chunk 4001/,
+ qr/${header}toast value 16460 chunk 5000 follows last expected
chunk 5/;
INSERT INTO $toastname (chunk_id, chunk_seq, chunk_data)
(SELECT chunk_id,
10*chunk_seq + 1000,
chunk_data
FROM $toastname
WHERE chunk_id = $value_id_to_corrupt)
- qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 6
has sequence number 1000, but expected sequence number 6/,
- qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 7
has sequence number 1010, but expected sequence number 7/,
- qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 8
has sequence number 1020, but expected sequence number 8/,
- qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 9
has sequence number 1030, but expected sequence number 9/,
- qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 10
has sequence number 1040, but expected sequence number 10/,
- qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 11
has sequence number 1050, but expected sequence number 11/,
- qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt was
expected to end at chunk 6, but ended at chunk 12/;
+ qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt index scan returned
chunk 1000 when expecting chunk 6/,
+ qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 1000 follows
last expected chunk 5/,
+ qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt index scan returned
chunk 1010 when expecting chunk 1001/,
+ qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 1010 follows
last expected chunk 5/,
+ qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt index scan returned
chunk 1020 when expecting chunk 1011/,
+ qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 1020 follows
last expected chunk 5/,
+ qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt index scan returned
chunk 1030 when expecting chunk 1021/,
+ qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 1030 follows
last expected chunk 5/,
+ qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt index scan returned
chunk 1040 when expecting chunk 1031/,
+ qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 1040 follows
last expected chunk 5/,
+ qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt index scan returned
chunk 1050 when expecting chunk 1041/,
+ qr/${header}toast value $value_id_to_corrupt chunk 1050 follows
last expected chunk 5/;
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
