At Tue, 4 May 2021 10:07:51 -0400, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote in
> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 12:27 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > On 2021-05-03 16:49:16 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > But perhaps we could work around this by allowing pgarch.c to access
> > > shared memory, in which case it could examine the current timeline
> > > whenever it wants, and probably also whatever LSNs it needs to know
> > > what's safe to archive.
> >
> > FWIW, the shared memory stats patch implies doing that, since the
> > archiver reports stats.
>
> Are you planning to commit that for v15? If so, will it be early in
> the cycle, do you think?
FWIW It's already done for v14 individually.
Author: Fujii Masao <fu...@postgresql.org>
Date: Mon Mar 15 13:13:14 2021 +0900
Make archiver process an auxiliary process.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
