Hi,
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 2:23 AM Zhihong Yu <z...@yugabyte.com> wrote:
> I was looking at
> Fix EXPLAIN ANALYZE for async-capable nodes.
Thanks for that!
> which adds the following parameter / field:
>
> + bool async_mode; /* true if node is in async mode */
>
> async_mode implies an enum: {sync, async}
> Since there are only two values, the data type is bool. I think it should be
> named is_async.
By async_mode, I mean "is in async mode?", as commented above. I
thought the naming is_in_async_mode would be a bit long, so I
shortened it to async_mode. IIUC, I think another example in our
codebase would be the hash_spill_mode parameter in the AggState
struct. So I think async_mode would be acceptable IMO.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
