> Hm. If Oracle does that, then there's an argument for us doing it > too. I can't get hugely excited about it, but maybe someone else > cares enough to prepare a patch.
Thanks for the confirmation. Attached patch supports these format patterns. Kindly review and let me know if any changes are required. Thanks & Regards, Nitin Jadhav On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 10:34 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostg...@gmail.com> writes: > > Thanks for the explanation. I also feel that we may not support every > > case-variant. But the other reason which triggered me to think in the > > other way is, as mentioned in commit [1] where this feature was added, > > says that these format patterns are compatible with Oracle. Whereas > > Oracle supports both upper case and lower case patterns. I just wanted > > to get it confirmed with this point before concluding. > > Hm. If Oracle does that, then there's an argument for us doing it > too. I can't get hugely excited about it, but maybe someone else > cares enough to prepare a patch. > > regards, tom lane
v1_support_of_tzh_tzm_patters.patch
Description: Binary data
