On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:31 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > What does that protect against that I was concerned about? That still > allows hint bits to be leaked, via > > 1) replay WAL record with FPI > 2) hint bit change during read > 3) incremental page change > > vs 1) 3). Even if we declare that OK, it doesn't actually address the > whole issue of WAL replay not necessarily re-creating bit identical page > contents.
You're right. That seems fatal, as it would lead to encrypting the different versions of the page with the IV on the master and the standby, and the differences would consist of old data that could be recovered by XORing the two encrypted page versions. To be clear, it is tuple data that would be recovered, not just hint bits. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
