From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> > I'm still not sure why the execution time with 0 workers (or serial execution > or > no parallelism involved) on my testing system is 112 sec compared to 58 sec on > Hou-San's system for the same use case. Maybe the testing system I'm using > is not of the latest configuration compared to others.
What's the setting of wal_level on your two's systems? I thought it could be that you set it to > minimal, while Hou-san set it to minimal. (I forgot the results of 2 and 4 workers, though.) Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
