On 2021-Jun-03, Tom Lane wrote: > If the unlink fails, there's only really a problem if the subsequent > open() fails to overwrite the file --- and that stanza is perfectly > capable of complaining for itself. So I think the code is fine and > there's no need for a separate message about the unlink. Refusing to > proceed, as you've done here, is strictly worse than what we have.
It does seem to deserve a comment explaining this. -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile "Pensar que el espectro que vemos es ilusorio no lo despoja de espanto, sólo le suma el nuevo terror de la locura" (Perelandra, C.S. Lewis)
