On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 11:14 PM Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 3 Jun 2021, at 23:11, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > >> I wonder if we should use SSL/TLS in more places in our documentation. > > > > No objection to doing that in the docs; I'm just questioning > > switching the code-visible names.
+1. I also don't think it's worth changing the actual names, I think that'll cause more problems than it solves. But we can, and probably should, change the messaging around it, particularly the docs (but probably also comments in the config file). > As long as it's still searchable by "SSL", "TLS" and "SSL/TLS" and not just > the > latter. Agreed, making it searchable and easily cross-linkable.. And maybe both terms should be in the glossary. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
