On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 02:53, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Indeed. I think this is entirely pointless; there's zero hope that > any consistency you might establish right now will persist very long. > The largest effect of this proposed patch will be to create > back-patching headaches.
hmm. Yet we do have other standards which we do manage to maintain. I did limit the scope to just the docs and error messages. My thoughts were that someone fudging a backpatch on the docs seems less likely to cause a nuclear meltdown than someone doing the same in .c code. David
