Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > On 2021-Jun-15, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think this ought to be reverted and reviewed more carefully.
> It seems to me that removing the cast-to-range[] is a sufficient fix, > and that we can do with only the unnest part for pg14; the casts can be > added in 15 (if at all). That would mean reverting only half the patch. Might be a reasonable solution. But right now I'm annoyed that the buildfarm is broken, and I'm also convinced that this didn't get adequate testing. I think "revert and reconsider" is the way forward for today. regards, tom lane