aOn Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:56:51PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 5:12 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 2:31 PM Simon Riggs > > <simon.ri...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > > > > I attach both clean and compare versions. > > > > > > > Do we want to hold this work for PG15 or commit in PG14 and backpatch > > it till v10 where we have made hash indexes crash-safe? I would vote > > for committing in PG14 and backpatch it till v10, however, I am fine > > if we want to commit just to PG14 or PG15. > > Backpatch makes sense to me, but since not everyone will be reading > this thread, I would look towards PG15 only first. We may yet pick up > additional corrections or additions before a backpatch, if that is > agreed.
Yeah, I think backpatching makes sense. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
