On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:19:45AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > I think it's still relevant, since many people may not end up with binaries > --with-lz4 (I'm thinking of cloud providers). PGLZ is what existing data > uses, > and people may not want to/know to migrate to shiny new features, but they'd > like it if their queries were 20% faster after upgrading without needing to.
Yeah, I agree that local improvements here are relevant, particularly as we don't enforce the rewrite of toast data already compressed with pglz. So, we still need to stick with pglz for some time. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
