> On 8 Jul 2021, at 07:01, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 12:49:25AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Since we're already past beta2, I'm not sure that's a good idea. We >> can't really treat pageinspect 1.9 as something that the world has >> never seen. > > Yeah, that's why I would object to new changes in 1.9 and > REL_14_STABLE. So my take would be to just have 1.10, and do those > changes on HEAD.
+1, this should go into a 1.10 version. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
