On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 10:08 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 11:37 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 9:58 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Please find attached the latest patch set v93* > > > > > > > Thanks, I have gone through the 0001 patch and made a number of > > changes. (a) Removed some of the code which was leftover from previous > > versions, (b) Removed the Assert in apply_handle_begin_prepare() as I > > don't think that makes sense, (c) added/changed comments and made a > > few other cosmetic changes, (d) ran pgindent. > > > > Let me know what you think of the attached? > > The patch looks good to me, I don't have any comments.
I tried the v95-0001 patch. - The patch applied cleanly and all build / testing was OK. - The documentation also builds OK. - I checked all v95-0001 / v93-0001 differences and found no problems. - Furthermore, I noted that v95-0001 patch is passing the cfbot [1]. So this patch LGTM. ------ [1] http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_33_2914.log Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia