On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 1:42 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Personally, the new name pg_publication_sch is not very easy to understand. > (Maybe it's because I am not a native english speaker. If others feel ok, > please ignore this comment) >
I was actually thinking the same thing. I prefer the full SCHEMA/schema, even for all the internal variables/definitions which have been changed since the last patch version. I think Vignesh was trying to be consistent with pg_publication_rel and pg_subscription_rel, but maybe "rel" is better understood to be an abbreviation for "relation" than "sch" for "schema"? Thoughts from others? Regards, Greg Nancarrow Fujitsu Australia
