Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: > Dang it, yes. The tenant needs to be members of all the other users, > not the other way around. I spent a long time trying to not get that > backwards and still did.
The "membership" terminology is inherently confusing I fear.
Maybe better to say that all the roles-to-be-audited must
be GRANTed to the "tenant" role?
regards, tom lane
