Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery

[Amul Sul]

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 6:47 PM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 1:37 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I pushed 0001.
>
> That's great. I just realized that this leaves us with identical
> RequestCheckpoint() calls in two nearby places. Is there any reason
> not to further simplify as in the attached?
>
+1, also, can we just get rid off "promoted" flag? The only
inconvenience is we might need to check three flags instead of one to
perform the checkpoint at the end.