> On 26 Aug 2021, at 15:43, Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le jeu. 26 août 2021 à 21:38, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : > > On 26 Aug 2021, at 15:09, Bruce Momjian <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Basically, pg_upgrade has avoided any backend changes that could be > > controlled by GUCs and I am not sure we want to start adding such > > changes for just this. > > In principle I think it’s sound to try to avoid backend changes where possible > without sacrificing robustness. > > I agree, but it seems quite more likely that an extension relying on a > bgworker changes this guc, compared to an extension forcing autovacuum to be > on for instance.
Agreed, in this particular case I think there is merit to the idea of enforcing it in the backend. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
