Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:26:23PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> I'm fine with increasing this policy, but I don't have strong feelings. If >> we >> feel the perlcritic policy change is too much, I would still prefer to go >> ahead >> with the map rewrite part of the patch though. > > I have no issue either about the rewrite part of the patch, so I'd > tend to just do this part and move on. Daniel, would you like to > apply that?
Why the resistance to the perlcritic part? That one case is the only violation in the tree today, and it's a pattern we don't want to let back in (I will surely object every time I see it when reviewing patches), so why not automate it? - ilmari
