>> > My 0.02€: From a benchmarking perspective, ISTM that it makes sense to >> > include disconnection times, which are clearly linked to connections, >> > especially with -C. So I'd rather have the more meaningful figure even >> > at the price of a small change in an undocumented feature. >> >> +1. The aim of -C is trying to measure connection overhead which >> naturally includes disconnection overhead. > > I think it is better to measure disconnection delays when -C is specified in > pg 14. This seems not necessary when -C is not specified because pgbench just > reports "initial connection time".
Ok. > However, what about pg13 or later? Do you think we should also change the > behavior of pg13 or later? If so, should we measure disconnection delay even > when -C is not specified in pg13? You mean "pg13 or before"? -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
