On 9/10/21, 1:02 PM, "Robert Haas" <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 5:53 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossa...@amazon.com> wrote: >> I think it might be clearer to >> somehow indicate that the value is essentially the size of the main >> shared memory area in terms of the huge page size, but I'm not sure >> how to do that concisely. Perhaps it is enough to just make sure the >> description of "huge_pages_required" is detailed enough. > > shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages? It's kinda long, but a long name > that you can understand without reading the docs is better than a > short one where you can't.
I think that's an improvement. The only other idea I have at the moment is num_huge_pages_required_for_shared_memory. Nathan
