On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 3:44 PM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Last call for complaints about either the overall direction or the > specific implementation choices...
A complaint showed up over at http://postgr.es/m/979131631633...@mail.yandex.ru and pursuant to that complaint I have made the new syntax for controlling the checkpoint type look like CHECKPOINT { 'fast' | 'spread' } rather than just having an option called FAST. It was suggested over there to also rename WAIT to WAIT_WAL_ARCHIVED, but I don't like that for reasons explained on that thread and so have not adopted that proposal. Sergei also helpfully pointed out that I'd accidentally deleted a version check in one place, so this version is also updated to not do that. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v6-0001-Flexible-options-for-BASE_BACKUP.patch
Description: Binary data
v6-0002-Flexible-options-for-CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT.patch
Description: Binary data
