> On Sep 27, 2021, at 1:19 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > I'm a little inclined to re-enable the test without your other > changes, just to see what happens. That sounds like a good idea. Even if it passes at first, I'd prefer to leave it for a week or more to have a better sense of how stable it is. Applying my patches too soon would just add more variables to a not-so-well understood situation. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests Noah Misch
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests Mark Dilger
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests Tom Lane
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tes... Mark Dilger
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP... Tom Lane
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP... Noah Misch
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in variou... Tom Lane
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in variou... Mark Dilger
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in va... Mark Dilger
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in va... Tom Lane
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in va... Mark Dilger
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in va... Tom Lane
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in va... Michael Paquier
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in va... Tom Lane
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in va... Andrew Dunstan
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in va... Tom Lane
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in va... Mark Dilger
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in va... Tom Lane
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in va... Mark Dilger
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in va... Tom Lane
- Re: Fixing WAL instability in va... Michael Paquier