Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan

[devik]

> > question is whether we need it for hash indices. it is definitely
> > good for btree as they support range retrieval. hash ind. doesn't
> > it so I wouldn't implement it for them.
> 
> We need in fast heap tuple --> index tuple lookup for overwriting
> storage manager anyway...
 
oh .. there will be such one ?