I have committed this patch. It offers a speed up to ecpg.
>
> Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 11:22:19AM +0900, SAKAIDA Masaaki wrote:
> > > The following patch could solve the next error cases in 6.5.3-ecpglib.
> > >
> > > case 1.
> > > strcpy(str, "T''EST'TEST");
> > > exec sql insert into ecpg_test values ( 11, :str, 'kobe' ) ;
> > >
> > > error(-201)(Too many arguments line 1025.
> > >
> > > case 2.
> > > str( str, "T'''?'ESTTEST");
> > > exec sql insert into ecpg_test values ( 11, :str, 'kobe' ) ;
> > >
> > > error(-202)(Too few arguments line 1024.)
> > >
> > >
> > > However, these problems seems to be solved in 7.0-ecpglib.
> >
> > So that means the patch is not needed anymore?
>
> In the meaning of bug-fix, the patch is not needed. Because you
> have already modified "next_insert()" in 7.0-ecpglib. However
> in the meaning of speed-up, the patch will be needed.
> --
> Regards,
> SAKAIDA Masaaki -- Osaka, Japan
>
>
> *** postgresql-7.0.1/src/interfaces/ecpg/lib/execute.c.orig Tue Jun
> 6 15:02:34 2000
> --- postgresql-7.0.1/src/interfaces/ecpg/lib/execute.c Tue Jun 6 15:02:05
>2000
> ***************
> *** 278,283 ****
> --- 278,284 ----
> char *tobeinserted = NULL;
> char *p;
> char buff[20];
> + int hostvarl = 0;
>
> /*
> * Some special treatment is needed for records since we want
> ***************
> *** 559,565 ****
> return false;
>
> strcpy(newcopy, copiedquery);
> ! if ((p = next_insert(newcopy)) == NULL)
> {
>
> /*
> --- 560,566 ----
> return false;
>
> strcpy(newcopy, copiedquery);
> ! if ((p = next_insert(newcopy + hostvarl)) == NULL)
> {
>
> /*
> ***************
> *** 572,577 ****
> --- 573,579 ----
> else
> {
> strcpy(p, tobeinserted);
> + hostvarl = strlen(newcopy);
>
> /*
> * The strange thing in the second argument is the rest of the
>
>
>
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
