I like the pg_{import,export} names myself ... *nod*


On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:

> 
> > > > As a result do people have any objection to changing pg_restore to
> > > > pg_undump? Or pg_load?
> 
> Also possible would be a name like Oracle
> pg_exp and pg_imp for export and import.
> (or pg_export and pg_import)
> 
> Load and unload is often more tied to data only (no dml).
> 
> I agree that the current name pg_restore for its current functionality
> is not good and misleading in the light of WAL backup. 
> 
> Andreas
> 
> 

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED]           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 

Reply via email to