[HACKERS] Re: =?koi8-r?Q?=EF=D4=D7=C5=D4=3A_=EF=D4=D7=C5=D4=3A_WAL_and_index?= =?koi8-r?Q?es_=28Re=3A_=5BHACKERS=5D_WAL_status_=26_todo=29_?=

[Tom Lane]

"Mikheev, Vadim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And how could I use such records on recovery
> being unable to know what data columns represent
> keys, what functions should be used for ordering?

Um, that's not built into the index either, is it?  OK, you win ...

I'm still nervous about how we're going to test the WAL code adequately
for the lesser-used index types.  Any ideas out there?

                        regards, tom lane