Mark Hollomon writes: > Also > > "DROP TABLE x, y, z" is allowed, but > > "DROP VIEW x, y, z" is not. > > Any reason other than historical? I don't know how it looks now, but the "DROP TABLE x, y, z" was pretty broken a while ago. For example, if there was some sort of dependency between the tables (foreign keys?) it would abort and leave an inconsistent state. I'm not very fond of this extension, but keep the issue in mind. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
- [HACKERS] DROP VIEW code question Mark Hollomon
- Re: [HACKERS] DROP VIEW code question Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] DROP VIEW code question Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] DROP VIEW code question Mark Hollomon