Tom Lane writes: > Hm. I don't see any really good reason why host() rejects CIDR input > in the first place. What's wrong with producing the host address > that corresponds to extending the CIDR network address with zeroes? Because it's semantically wrong. It's just as wrong as converting DATE to TIMESTAMP by setting the time to zero. -- And we actually do this... -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to... Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to... Larry Rosenman
- [HACKERS] Second proposal: wha... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Second proposal:... Larry Rosenman
- [HACKERS] Re: Second proposal:... Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] Re: Second proposal:... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to... Dominic J. Eidson
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about INE... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about... Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman